It’s been over a week since I returned from the Wheaton College Theology Conference and I think that I have finally digested much of what was said there. While some may not have thought he belonged I was very happy that Tony Jones, the Big Kahuna of Emergent Village, was not only invited to speak, but to give a plenary lecture. It was the session I looked the most forward to and the session that I enjoyed the most. I knew going in that it would not be your traditional evangelical church speak, and I was sure that whatever he said would probably create some controversy and reaction – I was right on all three counts. However, what I was not counting on was how good lecture would be; I had heard of Tony and read his chapter in Listening to the Beliefs of Emerging Churches, but past that I didn’t know much about him. Most of my friends would lead you to believe he was Satan’s henchman because of his association with the Emerging Church. I of course do not believe it; his talk and his graciousness in the face of questions illustrated to me that he deeply loves Jesus, his church, and also the lost world into which we are sent to do missions. What follows is an open letter of sorts to Tony Jones of my questions about his ideas.
His main point, drawn on a really cool baseball analogy, is that Orthodoxy Happens or orthodoxy is an event, and so there is (to paraphrase him the best I can remember) “no acontextual, universal orthodoxy.” To read his reflections on the conference see here and here. The second link contains his very good summary of his paper.
Dear Tony,
First, thank you for your presentation at the Wheaton Conference. It was not only enjoyable, but it was thoughtful and well put together. I also liked that you wore jeans and use PowerPoint; I even had a cup of coffee – if we would have had candles, couches, and some Sigur Ros playing in the background we could have had church. (I wish sarcasm came across in emails). Seriously, it was a fine presentation – and even more, it was refreshing that you prayed before your lecture as none of the other speakers did that. Thanks.
On another note, this is not my preferred way of doing to conversation. It seems so very unemerging to have a dialogue through the blog world. It would be much better to sit down over a beer or two and work through my questions. But such is life. This way will work.
Rather than respond to your presentation at this juncture I just want to ask you a couple questions. Any response you have time to give would be much appreciated. I am still working through your basic premise and D.H. Williams question about defining the strike zone and especially how we can be sure that the strike zone will never be above the head of the batter. I am beginning to formulate my answer to this, and I am comfortable living in the paradox, but this wrestling may influence a lot of my questions. At this point I can say that the strike zone will never be above the head of the batter because then the game would be impossible to play and no fun to watch – the connection to the event of orthodoxy is clear in my mind, but not settled. Anyway, to the questions:
1) As I said I am still working through why at some point the strike zone might not change so much that a strike can be called when the ball is above the head of the batter. I don’t mind the paradox, and maybe should just trust that as the community of baseball will prevent that from happening so the game can still be played, so will the community of those who follow Jesus.
2) Related to that though I have a question; What makes someone part of the community that gets to participate in the event of orthodoxy? To use your baseball analogy, it is the community of baseball that in a sense “determines” the strike zone and not the community of football or hockey – so are there voices that are not part of the event of orthodoxy…voices that should not have a role in defining the orthodox strike zone so to speak? If so, how do you determine this? [I think this is my main question - and I don't want to define people out of the kingdom/community at all - but just as there are standards for baseball there are standards for the Christian]
3) When I first thought of this question I wasn’t really serious, but I’ll ask it anyway – if orthodoxy is an event does that also mean that heresy is an event? Does heresy happen?
4) What role does Scripture play in your conversation about life and theology?
5) In the story told in Acts 16 a not-yet-Christian (to borrow the language of Rick McKinley) asks the apostles, “What must I do to be saved?” Now, I believe that Christianity is about so much more than “me and Jesus and my Bible.” We must stop preaching that all salvation is about is escaping hell. We need to recover the idea of the Kingdom of God as Wright is trying to do. We must also recover more of a communal idea of salvation (and this includes a recovery of the sacraments). We must also include with salvation the important concept of orthopraxy. I am also strongly in favor of the idea that people will belong before they believe. So I ask this question not from the typical crusade evangelism perspective. Nevertheless, we are still called to the missio Dei – so if you were sitting in an coffeeshop in downtown Minneapolis and someone asked you the same question, “What must I do to be saved?” what would you tell them? Or, even better, someone you have been friends with for a long time – they have seen the way you live – they have heard what you say – you have a relationship with them – and they ask you; what do you say?
Thanks. I am sure I will have more questions but I’ll start with these. Thanks. God Bless. And keep doing the work of the Kingdom.
In Christ,
Robert Lancaster